marjaerwin: (Default)
I have been reading May Daly's Gyn/Ecology. I know it is terribly cissupremacist, but I understand it's helped other womyn heal from trauma, so it might help me too.

A few people, Zoe Brain for one, have picked out Mary Daly's comments about the "Dionysian solution" to argue that Daly was arguing for a "final solution" and the mass murder of the male sex. She was not.

Daly dissects the Apollonian/Dionysian dichotomy in western thought, arguing that womyn cannot win freedom by choosing Dionysian though over Apollonian thought, because these are two sides of the same male-supremacist ideology. She writes:

To Dionysus was attributed the ability to shatter cognitive boundaries in women, that is, the capacity to drive women mad - which he did whenever possible. Madness is the only ecstasy offered to women by the Dionysian "Way." While the supermasculine Apollo overtly oppresses/destroys with his contrived boundaries/hierarchies/rules/roles, the feminine Dionysus blurs the senses, seduces, confuses his victims - drugging them into complicity, offering them his "heart" as a love potion that poisons. ...

The Dionysian solution for women, which is violation of our own Hag-ocratic boundaries, is The Final Solution. To succumb to this seductive invitation is to become incorporated into the Mystical Body of Maledom, that is, to become "living" dead women, forever pumping our own blood into the Heavenly Head, giving head to the Holy Host, losing our heads. The demonic power of Dionysian deception hinges on this invitation to incorporation/assimilation, resulting in inability to draw our own lines. To accept this invitation is to become unhinged, dismembered. Refusal is essential to the process of the Self's re-membering, re-fusing.


I thin it's clear, from the context, that Daly opposes the Dionysian Solution. She isn't advocating the extermination of the male sex, she is trying to prevent the extermination of female selves.

Of course, she immediately follows with another anti-trans screed. X(

Seems like she's just fine with the extermination of trans female selves, as long as non-trans ones are spared. But it's much harder to defend feminism for some womyn when you don't defend bodily autonomy for all womyn.

Not to pick on Zoe Brain, but she quotes, and in my opinion misquotes, Mary Daly here: http://aebrain.blogspot.com/2010/01/charitable-view-of-mary-daily.html and here: http://womenborntranssexual.com/2012/06/06/radfem-fantasies-and-follies/#comment-13563
marjaerwin: (Default)
http://radicalhub.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/re-membering/

The essay is fascinating in its own right, but it also explains why transphobia and/or femmephobia might tempt cultural feminists. To Mary Daly, the central patriarchal myth had the male hero defeat the primal female goddess, dis-membering the female and replacing it with the sterile submissive feminine. In effect, you could say the patriarchy unsexes and ef-feminates the primal female. And in so doing makes her feminine.

I haven't examined this from every angle, but it seems as though they suppose that femininity, birth control, and all forms of transsexualism turn people into the castrated dis-membered female. I think it makes more sense to regard transsexualism as an attempt to embody the discovered self - creating one's own originality - whether re-membering or re-inventing. And some cultural feminists called out the attack on femininity for reinforcing androgyny.

Profile

marjaerwin: (Default)
marjaerwin

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 17th, 2025 11:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios