marjaerwin: (Default)
Human civilization is running out of the oil it currently depends on. It is destroying the forests and depleting the fisheries. It is changing the climate with still-increasing CO2 emissions. And it is growing. It is getting harder and harder to extract resources for this civilization, and it is leading to techniques, such as oil-sands extraction and deepwater drilling, with worse and worse effects.

One way or another we are in for hard times ahead.

In the best-case scenario, human civilization devotes the needed resources to switch over to sustainable energy sources and sustainable food production. An economic revolution, including the collapse of capitalism and the state, keeps the plutocracy and the military-torture-prison-industrial complex from drawing off more wealth. A demographic revolution allows the birth rate to fall. A technological revolution allows civilization to adapt to new energy sources. People still face hard times, but civilization survives.

A major revolution will be required. It might look like the Egyptian revolution, but in China, India, America and/or Europe. I think Europe is most likely to accomplish the switchover.

In the most likely scenario, the state remains in power and devotes all its resources to staying in power. All of the current trends continue. By the time it loses power, its environmental destruction and resource depletion has caused mass starvation and reversed the industrial revolution. If human civilization is to recover, it must find new energy sources with fewer resources than before; however, it can still turn to old knowledge and salvaged goods.

A group which prepares for the collapse will be better-able to influence the ideas of post-collapse society. An activist approach which creates working alternatives would save a lot here, and could encourage groups to defect from the ruling institutions and switch tracks from this to a partial approximation of the better case.

In the worst-case scenario, they hit the button. The cities, mines, oilfields, and whatever else they target is destroyed. In this case, there is no salvage. There may be human survivors. There is little prospect of recovery.

There is nothing we can do to prepare for the worst-case scenario. But it is the least likely, if only because it is so terrible.
marjaerwin: (Default)
Yes.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/01/24-1

Driving Straight Into Catastrophe

by Julio Godoy

PARIS - Despite repeated warnings by environmental and climate experts that reduction of fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions is fundamental to forestalling global warming, disaster appears imminent. According to the latest statistics, unprecedented climate change has Earth hurtling down a path of catastrophic proportions.


Why. The. Fuck. do people keep letting this get worse?

Why. The. Fuck. does the state persecute environmentalists while subsidizing environmental destruction - where the profits go to the few and the costs go to all?

It's mind-blowingly stupid. An effective parasite has the sense to preserve its host. But the ruling class does not show any interest in preserving the people or the earth we all live on.

The state will not take one step to preserve the environment, humanity, and itself, but it will devote resources to make sure no one else acts. The state, as an institution, appears capable of paranoia, but not of forethought.

What. The. Fuck. is to be done?

Profile

marjaerwin: (Default)
marjaerwin

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819202122 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 06:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios