I come to expect more high-minded debate from someone who brags and blags [sic] about the precision she learned in education. That it isn't forthcoming is not surprising. Your need to engage without said logic and precision is, however, most surprising.

It's a shame, I hear Jesuit and I think of the crystal clear liberalism of Trudeau. I would have greatly enjoyed debating someone of that intellectual calibre. Do you think it's the LSE that teaches argument beyond a repetition of the thrust of the thesis?